AMD Ryzen Embedded V1202B vs AMD A10-6700

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Embedded V1202B and AMD A10-6700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1202B

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
• Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1624 vs 1606
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3512 vs 3113

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-6700

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• Around 87% higher clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 923 vs 871
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 923 vs 871
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1228 vs 516
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1228 vs 516
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3083 vs 1058
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3083 vs 1058

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Embedded V1202B
CPU 2: AMD A10-6700

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1624 1606
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	3512 3113
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	871 923
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	871 923
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	516 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	516 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	1058 3083
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	1058 3083

Compare specifications (specs)