AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 14
- Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 14% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 16 vs 14 |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core) |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zen | Zen |
Launch date | July 2017 | July 2017 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 213 mm | 213 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 32768 KB | 32768 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 14 | 16 |
Transistor count | 9600 million | 9600 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | SP3r2 | SP3r2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 155 Watt | 155 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |