AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 28 more cores, run more applications at once: 32 vs 4
- 56 more threads: 64 vs 8
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 14 nm FinFET
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 16x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2292 vs 2152
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 32501 vs 8497
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 10 May 2018 |
Number of cores | 32 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 64 vs 8 |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm FinFET |
L1 cache | 3072 KB vs 384 KB |
L2 cache | 16 MB vs 2 MB |
L3 cache | 64 MB vs 4 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2292 vs 2152 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 32501 vs 8497 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
- Around 40% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 68°C
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 68°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2292 | 2152 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 32501 | 8497 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1018 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 10702 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7913 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.562 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.002 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 208.928 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1858 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1994 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5566 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1858 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1994 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5566 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zen | Raven Ridge |
Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 10 May 2018 |
OPN PIB | YD299XAZAFWOF | |
OPN Tray | YD299XAZUIHAF | YD240BC5M4MFB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Place in performance rating | 906 | 245 |
Price now | $1,729.99 | |
Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.09 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Die size | 213 mm | 210 mm |
L1 cache | 3072 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 64 MB | 4 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm FinFET |
Maximum core temperature | 68°C | 95°C |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 32 | 4 |
Number of threads | 64 | 8 |
Transistor count | 19200 million | 4950 million |
Unlocked | ||
Compute Cores | 15 | |
Number of GPU cores | 11 | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2933 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | sTR4 | AM4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 65 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Not included | Wraith Stealth |
Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Graphics |
||
Graphics max frequency | 1250 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 11 | |
Processor graphics | Radeon Vega 11 Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI |