AMD Sempron 2500+ vs AMD Sempron 3300+
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 2500+ and AMD Sempron 3300+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 2500+
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 405 vs 394
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | July 2005 vs April 2005 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 405 vs 394 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3300+
- Around 43% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 315 vs 207
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 315 vs 207 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 2500+
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3300+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Sempron 2500+ | AMD Sempron 3300+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 405 | 394 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 207 | 315 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Sempron 2500+ | AMD Sempron 3300+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Palermo | Palermo |
| Launch date | July 2005 | April 2005 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | $30 |
| Place in performance rating | 3158 | 3160 |
| Price now | $79.95 | $60 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.24 | 2.37 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 63 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 754 | 754 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 62 Watt |
