AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF vs AMD Sempron 3400+
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF and AMD Sempron 3400+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF
- Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 62 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3400+
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| L2 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3400+
| Name | AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF | AMD Sempron 3400+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 346 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 292 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF | AMD Sempron 3400+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Manila | Manila |
| Launch date | May 2006 | May 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 3209 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | |
| Price now | $29.91 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.46 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 103 mm | 103 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 81 million | 81 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM2 | AM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 62 Watt |