AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF vs AMD Sempron 3400+

Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF and AMD Sempron 3400+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF

  • Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 62 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 62 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3400+

  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
L2 cache 256 KB vs 128 KB

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3400+

Name AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF AMD Sempron 3400+
PassMark - Single thread mark 346
PassMark - CPU mark 292

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF AMD Sempron 3400+

Essentials

Architecture codename Manila Manila
Launch date May 2006 May 2006
Place in performance rating not rated 3207
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $30
Price now $29.91
Value for money (0-100) 4.46

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 103 mm 103 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 128 KB 256 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 90 nm
Maximum frequency 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 81 million 81 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM2 AM2
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 62 Watt

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF with others

AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF AMD
Sempron 3200+ EE SFF
vs AMD Sempron 3500+ AMD
Sempron 3500+
AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF AMD
Sempron 3200+ EE SFF
vs AMD Sempron 3400+ EE SFF AMD
Sempron 3400+ EE SFF
AMD Sempron 3200+ EE SFF AMD
Sempron 3200+ EE SFF
vs AMD Sempron 3400+ AMD
Sempron 3400+