AMD Sempron 3600+ vs AMD Sempron 3300+
Comparative analysis of AMD Sempron 3600+ and AMD Sempron 3300+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3600+
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 364 vs 315
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2006 vs April 2005 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 364 vs 315 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3300+
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 394 vs 377
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 394 vs 377 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Sempron 3600+
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3300+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Sempron 3600+ | AMD Sempron 3300+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 377 | 394 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 364 | 315 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Sempron 3600+ | AMD Sempron 3300+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Manila | Palermo |
Launch date | May 2006 | April 2005 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | $30 |
Place in performance rating | 3170 | 3161 |
Price now | $12 | $60 |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.93 | 2.37 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 103 mm | 84 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 81 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2 | 754 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 62 Watt |