AMD Turion II Neo K625 vs Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

Comparative analysis of AMD Turion II Neo K625 and Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Memory, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion II Neo K625

• CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 70 Watt
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 618 vs 347

Reasons to consider the Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

• Around 105% higher clock speed: 3.07 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 657 vs 631

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Turion II Neo K625
CPU 2: Intel Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	631 657
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	618 347

Compare specifications (specs)