Intel Atom C2558 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom C2558 and Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom C2558
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1424 vs 774
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1424 vs 774 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 849 vs 512
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 849 vs 512 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom C2558
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom C2558 | Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 512 | 849 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1424 | 774 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 253 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 449 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Atom C2558 | Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Rangeley | Penryn |
| Launch date | Q3'13 | 1 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 2927 | 2891 |
| Processor Number | C2558 | |
| Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor C Series | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Laptop |
| Price now | $38.50 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.61 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Die size | 107 mm | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.1 GHz | |
| Transistor count | 410 Million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/DDR3L 1600 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 34 mm x 28 mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1283 | PGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2 | |
| PCIe configurations | x1,x2,x4,x8,x16 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 6 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Integrated Intel® QuickAssist Technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
