Intel Atom E3845 vs Intel Celeron 1017U

Comparative analysis of Intel Atom E3845 and Intel Celeron 1017U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Atom E3845

  • CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Around 19% higher clock speed: 1.91 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 17 Watt
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1052 vs 895
Specifications (specs)
Launch date October 2013 vs 1 July 2013
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Number of threads 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 1.91 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 17 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 1052 vs 895

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1017U

  • Around -363% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs -40°C to 110°C
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 52% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 815 vs 536
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 12.017 vs 9.495
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1520 vs 1041
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1520 vs 1041
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.259 vs 0.787
Specifications (specs)
Maximum core temperature 105 °C vs -40°C to 110°C
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 815 vs 536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 12.017 vs 9.495
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1520 vs 1041
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1520 vs 1041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.259 vs 0.787

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Atom E3845
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 1017U

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
536
815
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1052
895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
9.495
12.017
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1041
1520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1041
1520
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.787
2.259
Name Intel Atom E3845 Intel Celeron 1017U
PassMark - Single thread mark 536 815
PassMark - CPU mark 1052 895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 9.495 12.017
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1041 1520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1041 1520
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.787 2.259
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 271
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 497
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 0.998

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Atom E3845 Intel Celeron 1017U

Essentials

Architecture codename Bay Trail Ivy Bridge
Launch date October 2013 1 July 2013
Place in performance rating 3032 3034
Processor Number E3845 1017U
Series Intel® Atom™ Processor E Series Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series
Status Launched Launched
Vertical segment Embedded Mobile

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 1.91 GHz 1.60 GHz
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) 128 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 22 nm
Maximum core temperature -40°C to 110°C 105 °C
Maximum frequency 1.91 GHz 1.6 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Number of threads 4 2
Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI
Die size 94 mm
L3 cache 2048 KB

Memory

ECC memory support
Max memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory size 8 GB 32 GB
Supported memory types DDR3L 1333 DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Maximum memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s

Graphics

Graphics base frequency 542 MHz 350 MHz
Graphics max frequency 792 MHz 1 GHz
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics Intel HD Graphics Intel HD Graphics
Graphics max dynamic frequency 1.00 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Clear Video technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology

Graphics interfaces

Number of displays supported 2 3
CRT
DisplayPort
eDP
HDMI
SDVO
Wireless Display (WiDi) support

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 25mm x 27mm 31mm x 24mm
Sockets supported FCBGA1170 FCBGA1023
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

Peripherals

Integrated IDE
Integrated LAN
Max number of PCIe lanes 4 16
PCI Express revision 2.0 2.0
PCIe configurations x4, x2, x1 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4
Total number of SATA ports 2
UART
USB revision 2.0, 3.0

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Anti-Theft technology

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
HD Audio
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
4G WiMAX Wireless
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® My WiFi technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Atom E3845 with others

Intel Atom E3845 Intel
Atom E3845
vs Intel Core i7-720QM Intel
Core i7-720QM
Intel Atom E3845 Intel
Atom E3845
vs Intel Core i5-480M Intel
Core i5-480M
Intel Atom E3845 Intel
Atom E3845
vs Intel Celeron 1017U Intel
Celeron 1017U