Intel Atom E3845 vs Intel Celeron 1017U

Comparative analysis of Intel Atom E3845 and Intel Celeron 1017U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Atom E3845

Intel Celeron 1017U

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Atom E3845

CPU is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
2 more threads: 4 vs 2
Around 19% higher clock speed: 1.91 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 17 Watt
Around 20% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1065 vs 890

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	October 2013 vs 1 July 2013
Number of cores	4 vs 2
Number of threads	4 vs 2
Maximum frequency	1.91 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core) vs 128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 17 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark	1065 vs 890

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1017U

Around -363% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs -40°C to 110°C
4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
Around 50% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 804 vs 536
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 12.017 vs 9.495
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1520 vs 1041
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1520 vs 1041
2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.259 vs 0.787

Specifications (specs)
Maximum core temperature	105 °C vs -40°C to 110°C
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	804 vs 536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	12.017 vs 9.495
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1520 vs 1041
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1520 vs 1041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.259 vs 0.787

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Atom E3845
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 1017U

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

536

804

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1065

890

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

9.495

12.017

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1041

1520

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1041

1520

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.787

2.259

Name	Intel Atom E3845	Intel Celeron 1017U
PassMark - Single thread mark	536	804
PassMark - CPU mark	1065	890
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	9.495	12.017
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1041	1520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1041	1520
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	0.787	2.259
Geekbench 4 - Single Core		271
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core		497
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		0.538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		0.998

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Atom E3845	Intel Celeron 1017U
Essentials
Architecture codename	Bay Trail	Ivy Bridge
Launch date	October 2013	1 July 2013
Place in performance rating	3032	3034
Processor Number	E3845	1017U
Series	Intel® Atom™ Processor E Series	Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series
Status	Launched	Launched
Vertical segment	Embedded	Mobile
Performance
64 bit support
Base frequency	1.91 GHz	1.60 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	512 KB
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	22 nm
Maximum core temperature	-40°C to 110°C	105 °C
Maximum frequency	1.91 GHz	1.6 GHz
Number of cores	4	2
Number of threads	4	2
Bus Speed		5 GT/s DMI
Die size		94 mm
L3 cache		2048 KB
Memory
ECC memory support
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory size	8 GB	32 GB
Supported memory types	DDR3L 1333	DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Maximum memory bandwidth		25.6 GB/s
Graphics
Graphics base frequency	542 MHz	350 MHz
Graphics max frequency	792 MHz	1 GHz
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics	Intel HD Graphics	Intel HD Graphics
Graphics max dynamic frequency		1.00 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Clear Video technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Graphics interfaces
Number of displays supported	2	3
CRT
DisplayPort
eDP
HDMI
SDVO
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
Compatibility
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Package Size	25mm x 27mm	31mm x 24mm
Sockets supported	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1023
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	17 Watt
Peripherals
Integrated IDE
Integrated LAN
Max number of PCIe lanes	4	16
PCI Express revision	2.0	2.0
PCIe configurations	x4, x2, x1	1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4
Total number of SATA ports	2
UART
USB revision	2.0, 3.0
Security & Reliability
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Anti-Theft technology
Advanced Technologies
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
HD Audio
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
4G WiMAX Wireless
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Instruction set extensions		Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® My WiFi technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring
Virtualization
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)