Intel Atom E680 vs Intel Celeron M 540
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom E680 and Intel Celeron M 540 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom E680
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 4.5 Watt vs 30 Watt
Launch date | September 2010 vs 1 October 2007 |
Number of threads | 2 vs 1 |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron M 540
- Around 16% higher clock speed: 1.86 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 542 vs 346
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.86 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
L2 cache | 1 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 542 vs 346 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Atom E680
CPU 2: Intel Celeron M 540
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Atom E680 | Intel Celeron M 540 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | 0 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 346 | 542 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Atom E680 | Intel Celeron M 540 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Tunnel Creek | Merom |
Launch date | September 2010 | 1 October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 3335 | 3326 |
Processor Number | E680 | 540 |
Series | Legacy Intel Atom® Processors | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Embedded | Mobile |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
Bus Speed | 2500 MHz PCIE | 533 MHz FSB |
Die size | 26 mm | 143 mm2 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Number of threads | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 47 million | 291 million |
VID voltage range | VCC (0.75 - 0.9V), VNN (0.75 - 1.1V) | 0.95V-1.30V |
64 bit support | ||
Front-side bus (FSB) | 533 MHz | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 1 | |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR2 800 | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 400 MHz | |
Processor graphics | Integrated | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Package Size | 22mmx22mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | FCBGA676 | PPGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 30 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
PCI Express revision | 1.0a | |
PCIe configurations | x1, root complex only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |