Intel Atom Z620 vs Intel Aubrey Isle
Comparative analysis of Intel Atom Z620 and Intel Aubrey Isle processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom Z620
- 300x lower typical power consumption: 1 Watt vs 300 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 1 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Aubrey Isle
- 31 more cores, run more applications at once: 32 vs 1
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 1.2 GHz vs 0.9 GHz
- 16x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 16x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 32 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 1.2 GHz vs 0.9 GHz |
L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core) |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Atom Z620 | Intel Aubrey Isle | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Lincroft | Knights Ferry |
Launch date | May 2010 | May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Server |
Performance |
||
Die size | 65 mm | 684 mm |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 32 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 0.9 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 32 |
Transistor count | 140 million | 2300 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | Intel BGA 518 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 1 Watt | 300 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology |