Intel Celeron 1000M vs Intel Core i5-520M
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1000M and Intel Core i5-520M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1000M
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 3.9x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8.3 GB
- 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.683 vs 0.443
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.125 vs 0.104
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 January 2013 vs 4 January 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8.3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.683 vs 0.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.125 vs 0.104 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-520M
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 63% higher clock speed: 2.93 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1093 vs 973
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1726 vs 1067
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 408 vs 325
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 868 vs 613
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.231 vs 15.87
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.69 vs 0.621
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.328 vs 1.319
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB vs 2048 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1093 vs 973 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1726 vs 1067 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 408 vs 325 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 868 vs 613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.231 vs 15.87 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.69 vs 0.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.328 vs 1.319 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1000M
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-520M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 1000M | Intel Core i5-520M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 973 | 1093 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1067 | 1726 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 325 | 408 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 613 | 868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.683 | 0.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.87 | 19.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.125 | 0.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.621 | 0.69 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.319 | 1.328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2055 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 1000M | Intel Core i5-520M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Arrandale |
| Launch date | 21 January 2013 | 4 January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $225 |
| Place in performance rating | 2841 | 3111 |
| Processor Number | 1000M | i5-520M |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Price now | $69.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.97 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.80 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 2.5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 94 mm | 81 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 382 million |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 17.1 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 8.3 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 766 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | 766 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B) | rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm |
| Sockets supported | FCPGA988 | PGA988, BGA1288 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 1000M with others
IntelCeleron 1000M vs
IntelCore i5-2520M
IntelCeleron 1000M vs
IntelCeleron B830
IntelCeleron 1000M vs
IntelAtom Z3735F
IntelCeleron 1000M vs
AMDGX-217GA
