Intel Celeron 1007U vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1007U and Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1007U
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.858 vs 0.261
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 72.255 vs 16.1
- 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.443 vs 0.498
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.706 vs 1.788
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 January 2013 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.858 vs 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 72.255 vs 16.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.443 vs 0.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.706 vs 1.788 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
- Around 60% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 942 vs 773
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 854 vs 844
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 306 vs 290
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 538 vs 534
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 942 vs 773 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 854 vs 844 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 306 vs 290 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 538 vs 534 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1007U
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 1007U | Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 773 | 942 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 844 | 854 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 290 | 306 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 534 | 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.858 | 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 72.255 | 16.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.443 | 0.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.706 | 1.788 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1983 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1983 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.074 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 1007U | Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Penryn |
| Launch date | 21 January 2013 | 15 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $209 |
| Place in performance rating | 2705 | 3208 |
| Price now | $184.99 | $49.18 |
| Processor Number | 1007U | P8600 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.22 | 9.20 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 94 mm | 107 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 3072 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 410 million |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.150V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 31mm x 24mm | 35 mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 25 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||