Intel Celeron 1007U vs Intel Core i7-2670QM
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1007U and Intel Core i7-2670QM processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1007U
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 100 °C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 72.255 vs 48.344
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.443 vs 1.403
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.706 vs 3.414
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 January 2013 vs 2 November 2011 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C vs 100 °C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 72.255 vs 48.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.443 vs 1.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.706 vs 3.414 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-2670QM
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
- Around 107% higher clock speed: 3.10 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1310 vs 772
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3744 vs 839
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 541 vs 290
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1915 vs 534
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.114 vs 1.858
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.10 GHz vs 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB vs 2048 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1310 vs 772 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3744 vs 839 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 541 vs 290 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1915 vs 534 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.114 vs 1.858 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1007U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-2670QM
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 1007U | Intel Core i7-2670QM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 772 | 1310 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 839 | 3744 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 290 | 541 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 534 | 1915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.858 | 3.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 72.255 | 48.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.443 | 1.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.706 | 3.414 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1983 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1983 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.364 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 1007U | Intel Core i7-2670QM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Sandy Bridge |
| Launch date | 21 January 2013 | 2 November 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $175 |
| Place in performance rating | 2694 | 2695 |
| Price now | $184.99 | $259 |
| Processor Number | 1007U | i7-2670QM |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.22 | 6.69 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 94 mm | 216 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | 6144 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 8 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 995 Million |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 21.3 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 |
| Device ID | 0x116 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 31mm x 24mm | 37.5mm x 37.5 (rPGA998) |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | FCPGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 45 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 1007U with others
IntelCeleron 1007U vs
IntelCore 2 Duo U7700
IntelCeleron 1007U vs
IntelCore i7-2670QM
IntelCeleron 1007U vs
IntelCeleron 530
