Intel Celeron 1007U vs Intel Core i7-2670QM

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1007U and Intel Core i7-2670QM processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1007U

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 100 °C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
  • 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 72.255 vs 48.344
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.443 vs 1.403
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.706 vs 3.414
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 January 2013 vs 2 November 2011
Maximum core temperature 105 °C vs 100 °C
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 17 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 72.255 vs 48.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.443 vs 1.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.706 vs 3.414

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-2670QM

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
  • Around 107% higher clock speed: 3.10 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
  • Around 70% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1311 vs 772
  • 4.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3737 vs 837
  • Around 87% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 541 vs 290
  • 3.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1915 vs 534
  • Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.114 vs 1.858
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Number of threads 8 vs 2
Maximum frequency 3.10 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
L1 cache 256 KB vs 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB vs 512 KB
L3 cache 6144 KB vs 2048 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1311 vs 772
PassMark - CPU mark 3737 vs 837
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 541 vs 290
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1915 vs 534
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.114 vs 1.858

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1007U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-2670QM

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
772
1311
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
837
3737
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
290
541
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
534
1915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.858
3.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
72.255
48.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.443
1.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.706
3.414
Name Intel Celeron 1007U Intel Core i7-2670QM
PassMark - Single thread mark 772 1311
PassMark - CPU mark 837 3737
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 290 541
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 534 1915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.858 3.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 72.255 48.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.443 1.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.706 3.414
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1983
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.364

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Celeron 1007U Intel Core i7-2670QM

Essentials

Architecture codename Ivy Bridge Sandy Bridge
Launch date 21 January 2013 2 November 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $86 $175
Place in performance rating 2692 2693
Price now $184.99 $259
Processor Number 1007U i7-2670QM
Series Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Launched Launched
Value for money (0-100) 2.22 6.69
Vertical segment Mobile Mobile

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 1.50 GHz 2.20 GHz
Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI 5 GT/s DMI
Die size 94 mm 216 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 256 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 1024 KB
L3 cache 2048 KB 6144 KB
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 32 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 105 °C
Maximum core temperature 105 °C 100 °C
Maximum frequency 1.5 GHz 3.10 GHz
Number of cores 2 4
Number of threads 2 8
Transistor count 1400 million 995 Million

Memory

Max memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s 21.3 GB/s
Maximum memory size 32 GB 32 GB
Supported memory types DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 DDR3 1066/1333

Graphics

Graphics base frequency 350 MHz 650 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 1.00 GHz 1.10 GHz
Graphics max frequency 1 GHz 1.1 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Clear Video technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics Intel HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 3000
Device ID 0x116

Graphics interfaces

CRT
DisplayPort
eDP
HDMI
Number of displays supported 3 2
SDVO
Wireless Display (WiDi) support

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 31mm x 24mm 37.5mm x 37.5 (rPGA998)
Sockets supported FCBGA1023 FCPGA988
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 17 Watt 45 Watt

Peripherals

Max number of PCIe lanes 16 16
PCI Express revision 2.0 2.0
PCIe configurations 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4

Security & Reliability

Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Intel® Identity Protection technology

Advanced Technologies

4G WiMAX Wireless
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 Intel® AVX
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® My WiFi technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Celeron 1007U with others

Intel Celeron 1007U Intel
Celeron 1007U
vs Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 Intel
Core 2 Duo U7700
Intel Celeron 1007U Intel
Celeron 1007U
vs Intel Core i7-2675QM Intel
Core i7-2675QM
Intel Celeron 1007U Intel
Celeron 1007U
vs Intel Core i7-2670QM Intel
Core i7-2670QM