Intel Celeron 1017U vs AMD FX-9590
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1017U and AMD FX-9590 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1017U
- Around 84% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 57°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- 12.9x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 220 Watt
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C vs 57°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-9590
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 2
- 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
- Around 213% higher clock speed: 5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 16x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1813 vs 815
- 7.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6790 vs 895
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 633 vs 271
- 6.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3042 vs 497
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.765 vs 2.259
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 25.735 vs 12.017
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.45 vs 0.1
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.418 vs 0.538
- 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 8.59 vs 0.998
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 512 KB |
L3 cache | 8 MB vs 2048 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1813 vs 815 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6790 vs 895 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 633 vs 271 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3042 vs 497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.765 vs 2.259 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 25.735 vs 12.017 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.45 vs 0.1 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.418 vs 0.538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.59 vs 0.998 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1017U
CPU 2: AMD FX-9590
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron 1017U | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 815 | 1813 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 895 | 6790 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 271 | 633 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 497 | 3042 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.259 | 10.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.017 | 25.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 | 0.45 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.538 | 1.418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.998 | 8.59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1520 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1520 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron 1017U | AMD FX-9590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Vishera |
Launch date | 1 July 2013 | July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 3033 | 2290 |
Processor Number | 1017U | |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors |
Status | Launched | |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
OPN PIB | FD9590FHHKWOF | |
OPN Tray | FD9590FHW8KHK | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.03 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
Die size | 94 mm | 315 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 8 MB |
L3 cache | 2048 KB | 8 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm SOI |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 57°C |
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | 5 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 8 |
Number of threads | 2 | 8 |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V | |
Transistor count | 1200 million | |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
CRT | ||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
SDVO | ||
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 31mm x 24mm | |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | AM3+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 220 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | n / a |
PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |