Intel Celeron 807UE vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 807UE and Intel Atom x5-Z8300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 807UE
- Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 4.88 GB vs 2 GB
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 90°C |
| Maximum memory size | 4.88 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom x5-Z8300
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- 3 more threads: 4 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 455 vs 421
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 814 vs 241
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 1 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 455 vs 421 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 814 vs 241 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 807UE
CPU 2: Intel Atom x5-Z8300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 807UE | Intel Atom x5-Z8300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 421 | 455 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 241 | 814 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 157 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 490 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.82 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.772 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.093 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.339 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.16 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 371 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 678 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1230 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 371 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 678 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1230 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 807UE | Intel Atom x5-Z8300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Cherry Trail |
| Launch date | Q4'11 | Q2'15 |
| Place in performance rating | 3107 | 3108 |
| Processor Number | 807UE | x5-Z8300 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.44 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 90°C |
| Number of cores | 1 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 1 | 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 1.84 GHz | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | 1 |
| Maximum memory size | 4.88 GB | 2 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR3L-RS 1600 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | |
| Max video memory | 2 GB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 31mm x 24mm (FCBGA1023) | 17mm x 17mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | UTFCBGA592 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080 | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 1 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x1 | |
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 807UE with others
IntelCeleron 807UE vs
IntelPentium B950
IntelCeleron 807UE vs
IntelCeleron N2840
IntelCeleron 807UE vs
IntelAtom x5-Z8300
