Intel Celeron G1820 vs Intel Core i5-3470
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G1820 and Intel Core i5-3470 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G1820
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher maximum core temperature: 72°C vs 67.4°C
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 77 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.452 vs 3.217
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 28.651 vs 9.637
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2399 vs 1515
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2399 vs 1515
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | December 2013 vs 8 April 2012 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72°C vs 67.4°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 77 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.452 vs 3.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 28.651 vs 9.637 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2399 vs 1515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2399 vs 1515 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-3470
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 3.60 GHz vs 2.7 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1940 vs 1539
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4676 vs 1715
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 734 vs 565
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2396 vs 1036
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.393 vs 0.235
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.821 vs 0.945
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.424 vs 2.149
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.60 GHz vs 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB vs 3072 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1940 vs 1539 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 4676 vs 1715 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 734 vs 565 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2396 vs 1036 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.393 vs 0.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.821 vs 0.945 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.424 vs 2.149 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1820
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3470
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G1820 | Intel Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1539 | 1940 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1715 | 4676 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 565 | 734 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1036 | 2396 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 2696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.452 | 3.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 28.651 | 9.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.235 | 0.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.945 | 1.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.149 | 5.424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 612 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1320 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2399 | 1515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 612 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1320 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2399 | 1515 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G1820 | Intel Core i5-3470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Ivy Bridge |
| Launch date | December 2013 | 8 April 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $110 | $184 |
| Place in performance rating | 2431 | 2422 |
| Price now | $75 | $112.06 |
| Processor Number | G1820 | i5-3470 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.83 | 17.60 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.70 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 177 mm | 132.8 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 6144 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 67 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 72°C | 67.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 1.7 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
| Device ID | 0x152 | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 77 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | 2011D |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron G1820 with others
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
IntelPentium E6800
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
AMDA6-3650
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
IntelCore i5-3330S
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
IntelCore i3-3225
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
AMDA8-5500B
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
AMDAthlon X4 760K
