Intel Celeron G460 vs AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G460 and AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G460

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
  • 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 125 Watt
  • 3.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1441 vs 437
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1749 vs 1485
Specifications (specs)
Launch date December 2011 vs September 2010
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 45 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 125 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1441 vs 437
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1749 vs 1485

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE

  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
  • Around 94% higher clock speed: 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
  • 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
  • Around 90% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1395 vs 734
  • 5.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2706 vs 481
  • 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.62 vs 0.446
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 12.098 vs 9.672
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.204 vs 0.071
Specifications (specs)
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Number of cores 4 vs 1
Maximum frequency 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 256 KB
L3 cache 6144 KB (shared) vs 1536 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1395 vs 734
PassMark - CPU mark 2706 vs 481
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.62 vs 0.446
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 12.098 vs 9.672
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.204 vs 0.071

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron G460
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
734
1395
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
481
2706
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1441
437
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1749
1485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.446
1.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
9.672
12.098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.071
0.204
Name Intel Celeron G460 AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE
PassMark - Single thread mark 734 1395
PassMark - CPU mark 481 2706
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1441 437
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1749 1485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.446 1.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 9.672 12.098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.071 0.204

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Celeron G460 AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE

Essentials

Architecture codename Sandy Bridge Deneb
Launch date December 2011 September 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $65
Place in performance rating 2728 2730
Price now $65
Processor Number G460
Series Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor
Status Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 4.66
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 1.80 GHz
Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI
Die size 131 mm 258 mm
L1 cache 64 KB 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 256 KB 512 KB (per core)
L3 cache 1536 KB 6144 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 45 nm
Maximum core temperature 65.5°C
Maximum frequency 1.8 GHz 3.5 GHz
Number of cores 1 4
Number of threads 2
Transistor count 504 million 758 million
Unlocked

Memory

Max memory channels 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 17 GB/s
Maximum memory size 32 GB
Supported memory types DDR3 1066 DDR3

Graphics

Graphics base frequency 650 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 1.00 GHz
Graphics max frequency 1 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics Intel HD Graphics

Graphics interfaces

Number of displays supported 2
Wireless Display (WiDi) support

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported FCLGA1155 AM3
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Peripherals

PCI Express revision 2.0

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)