Intel Celeron G540 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron G540 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G540
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1142 vs 1061
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 439 vs 337
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.936 vs 0.538
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.14 vs 0.135
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | September 2011 vs November 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1142 vs 1061 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 439 vs 337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.936 vs 0.538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.14 vs 0.135 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 3% higher maximum core temperature: 71.4°C vs 69.1°C
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1906 vs 1155
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1061 vs 845
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.964 vs 7.717
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.117 vs 0.713
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.999 vs 1.892
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C vs 69.1°C |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1906 vs 1155 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1061 vs 845 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.964 vs 7.717 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.117 vs 0.713 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.999 vs 1.892 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G540
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron G540 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1142 | 1061 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1155 | 1906 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 439 | 337 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 845 | 1061 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.936 | 0.538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.14 | 0.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.717 | 15.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.713 | 1.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.892 | 3.999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron G540 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Yorkfield |
| Launch date | September 2011 | November 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $158 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3078 | 3088 |
| Price now | $12.59 | $49.99 |
| Processor Number | G540 | Q8300 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 51.60 | 17.60 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.50 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 131 mm | 164 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 69.1°C | 71.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 504 million | 456 million |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 850 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1155 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron G540 with others
IntelCeleron G540 vs
AMDAthlon 64 2600+
IntelCeleron G540 vs
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8300
IntelCeleron G540 vs
AMDAthlon II X2 250u
IntelCeleron G540 vs
IntelAtom D510
IntelCeleron G540 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 440
IntelCeleron G540 vs
IntelPentium E5800
