Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Atom D425
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1900 and Intel Atom D425 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1900
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 34% higher clock speed: 2.42 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- 3.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 651 vs 271
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1149 vs 204
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 686 vs 602
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs June 2010 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.42 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
L1 cache | 224 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 651 vs 271 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1149 vs 204 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 vs 602 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom D425
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 497 vs 210
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 497 vs 210 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1900
CPU 2: Intel Atom D425
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Atom D425 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 651 | 271 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1149 | 204 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 210 | 497 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 | 602 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.336 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1007 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1007 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Atom D425 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Pineview |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | June 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $82 | $993 |
Place in performance rating | 3156 | 3141 |
Processor Number | J1900 | D425 |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | Legacy Intel Atom® Processors |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $992.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.10 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
L1 cache | 224 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.42 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | |
Die size | 66 mm2 | |
Transistor count | 123 million | |
VID voltage range | 0.800V-1.175V | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR3 800 (SODIMM only); DDR2 667/800 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 688 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 854 MHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | |
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | Integrated |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | 22mm x 22mm |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA559 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | 32-bit |
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | |
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |