Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E7200

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1900 and Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Core 2 Duo E7200

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1900

CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
Around 42% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 74.1°C
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
3.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1151 vs 991
Around 16% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 686 vs 593
11.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.068 vs 0.275
Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.139 vs 0.092

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 November 2013 vs April 2008
Number of cores	4 vs 2
Maximum core temperature	105°C vs 74.1°C
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 45 nm
L1 cache	224 KB vs 64 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark	1151 vs 991
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	686 vs 593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.068 vs 0.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.139 vs 0.092

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E7200

Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.53 GHz vs 2.42 GHz
Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Around 62% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1054 vs 652
Around 62% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 340 vs 210
Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18.545 vs 11.336
Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.567 vs 0.508
Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.987 vs 1.753

Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency	2.53 GHz vs 2.42 GHz
L2 cache	3072 KB vs 2 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1054 vs 652
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	340 vs 210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	18.545 vs 11.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	0.567 vs 0.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.987 vs 1.753

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1900
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E7200

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

652

1054

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1151

991

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

210

340

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

686

593

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

3.068

0.275

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

11.336

18.545

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.139

0.092

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

0.508

0.567

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.753

1.987

Name	Intel Celeron J1900	Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
PassMark - Single thread mark	652	1054
PassMark - CPU mark	1151	991
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	210	340
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	686	593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.068	0.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	11.336	18.545
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.139	0.092
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	0.508	0.567
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1.753	1.987
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1007
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1007

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Celeron J1900	Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
Essentials
Architecture codename	Bay Trail	Wolfdale
Launch date	1 November 2013	April 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$82
Place in performance rating	3166	3169
Processor Number	J1900	E7200
Series	Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status	Launched	Discontinued
Vertical segment	Desktop	Desktop
Price now		$75
Value for money (0-100)		6.40
Performance
64 bit support
Base frequency	2.00 GHz	2.53 GHz
L1 cache	224 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	3072 KB
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	45 nm
Maximum core temperature	105°C	74.1°C
Maximum frequency	2.42 GHz	2.53 GHz
Number of cores	4	2
Number of threads	4
Bus Speed		1066 MHz FSB
Die size		82 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)		74 °C
Transistor count		228 million
VID voltage range		0.8500V-1.3625V
Memory
Max memory channels	2
Maximum memory size	8 GB
Supported memory types	DDR3L 1333	DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Graphics
Graphics base frequency	688 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	854 MHz
Graphics max frequency	854 MHz
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics	Intel HD Graphics
Graphics interfaces
Number of displays supported	2
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
Compatibility
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Package Size	25mm X 27mm	37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported	FCBGA1170	LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	65 Watt
Peripherals
Max number of PCIe lanes	4
PCI Express revision	2.0
PCIe configurations	X4, X2, X1
Security & Reliability
Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Advanced Technologies
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Physical Address Extensions (PAE)	36-bit
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Thermal Monitoring
Virtualization
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)