Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E6750

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1900 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1900

  • CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • Around 46% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 72°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 65 nm
  • 3.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1151 vs 1012
  • Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 686 vs 628
  • 15.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.068 vs 0.193
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.139 vs 0.068
  • Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.508 vs 0.419
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 November 2013 vs July 2007
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Maximum core temperature 105°C vs 72°C
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 65 nm
L1 cache 224 KB vs 64 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 1151 vs 1012
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 686 vs 628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.068 vs 0.193
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.139 vs 0.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.508 vs 0.419

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E6750

  • Around 10% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.42 GHz
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 58% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1028 vs 651
  • Around 70% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 358 vs 210
  • Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 21.122 vs 11.336
  • Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.133 vs 1.753
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 2.67 GHz vs 2.42 GHz
L2 cache 4096 KB vs 2 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1028 vs 651
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 358 vs 210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 21.122 vs 11.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.133 vs 1.753

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1900
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E6750

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
651
1028
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1151
1012
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
210
358
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
686
628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.068
0.193
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
11.336
21.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.139
0.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.508
0.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.753
2.133
Name Intel Celeron J1900 Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
PassMark - Single thread mark 651 1028
PassMark - CPU mark 1151 1012
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 210 358
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 686 628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.068 0.193
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 11.336 21.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.139 0.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.508 0.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.753 2.133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1007
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1007

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Celeron J1900 Intel Core 2 Duo E6750

Essentials

Architecture codename Bay Trail Conroe
Launch date 1 November 2013 July 2007
Launch price (MSRP) $82
Place in performance rating 3154 3160
Processor Number J1900 E6750
Series Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Launched Discontinued
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Price now $12.95
Value for money (0-100) 38.98

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 2.00 GHz 2.66 GHz
L1 cache 224 KB 64 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 65 nm
Maximum core temperature 105°C 72°C
Maximum frequency 2.42 GHz 2.67 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Number of threads 4
Bus Speed 1333 MHz FSB
Die size 143 mm2
Transistor count 291 million
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.5V

Memory

Max memory channels 2
Maximum memory size 8 GB
Supported memory types DDR3L 1333 DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics

Graphics base frequency 688 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 854 MHz
Graphics max frequency 854 MHz
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Processor graphics Intel HD Graphics

Graphics interfaces

Number of displays supported 2
Wireless Display (WiDi) support

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 25mm X 27mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported FCBGA1170 PLGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Peripherals

Max number of PCIe lanes 4
PCI Express revision 2.0
PCIe configurations X4, X2, X1

Security & Reliability

Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) 36-bit
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Thermal Monitoring

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)