Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1900 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J1900
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 46% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 72°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1151 vs 1012
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 686 vs 628
- 15.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.068 vs 0.193
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.139 vs 0.068
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.508 vs 0.419
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs July 2007 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 72°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 224 KB vs 64 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1151 vs 1012 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 vs 628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 vs 0.193 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 vs 0.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.508 vs 0.419 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.42 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1028 vs 651
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 358 vs 210
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 21.122 vs 11.336
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.133 vs 1.753
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz vs 2.42 GHz |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1028 vs 651 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 358 vs 210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.122 vs 11.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.133 vs 1.753 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J1900
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 651 | 1028 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1151 | 1012 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 210 | 358 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 | 628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.068 | 0.193 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.336 | 21.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 | 0.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.508 | 0.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.753 | 2.133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1007 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1007 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Conroe |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | July 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $82 | |
Place in performance rating | 3154 | 3160 |
Processor Number | J1900 | E6750 |
Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $12.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.98 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
L1 cache | 224 KB | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 72°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.42 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of threads | 4 | |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 143 mm2 | |
Transistor count | 291 million | |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.5V | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
Graphics base frequency | 688 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 854 MHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | |
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm X 27mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | PLGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
PCIe configurations | X4, X2, X1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |