Intel Celeron M 900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron M 900 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron M 900
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
Launch date | 1 April 2009 vs 9 May 2007 |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 765 vs 263
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 690 vs 204
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Number of threads | 2 vs 1 |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 765 vs 263 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 690 vs 204 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron M 900
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Celeron M 900 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 263 | 765 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 204 | 690 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 266 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 441 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.218 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.073 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.317 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.613 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Celeron M 900 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
Launch date | 1 April 2009 | 9 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | $234 |
Place in performance rating | 3260 | 3248 |
Processor Number | 900 | T7300 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Price now | $30.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.33 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.20 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 2 |
Number of threads | 1 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
L1 cache | 64 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | PGA478 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |