Intel Celeron N2910 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N2910 and Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2910
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 812 vs 336
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2180 vs 584
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.999 vs 0.273
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.093 vs 0.076
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 September 2013 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 812 vs 336 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2180 vs 584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.999 vs 0.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.093 vs 0.076 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
- Around 58% higher clock speed: 2.53 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1022 vs 447
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 960 vs 778
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.217 vs 5.915
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.998 vs 1.589
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.548 vs 0.256
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.53 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| L2 cache | 3072 KB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1022 vs 447 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 960 vs 778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.217 vs 5.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.998 vs 1.589 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.548 vs 0.256 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2910
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N2910 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 447 | 1022 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 778 | 960 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 812 | 336 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2180 | 584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.999 | 0.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.915 | 16.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.093 | 0.076 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.589 | 1.998 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.256 | 0.548 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron N2910 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Penryn |
| Launch date | 11 September 2013 | 1 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 3167 | 3169 |
| Processor Number | N2910 | P8700 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | |
| Price now | $37.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.60 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 410 million | |
| VID voltage range | 1.00V - 1.25V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 8.79 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1066 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 313 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 756 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 756 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | BGA479, PGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 25 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron N2910 with others
IntelCeleron N2910 vs
IntelPentium M 1.30
IntelCeleron N2910 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P8700
IntelCeleron N2910 vs
IntelCore i5-2467M
