Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N2940 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N2940
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 75% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1045 vs 1011
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 632 vs 618
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.144 vs 0.272
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.116 vs 0.079
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 May 2014 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| L1 cache | 224 KB vs 128 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1045 vs 1011 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 632 vs 618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.144 vs 0.272 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.116 vs 0.079 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
- Around 12% higher clock speed: 2.53 GHz vs 2.25 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1047 vs 607
- Around 72% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 342 vs 199
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 21.389 vs 7.897
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.509 vs 0.47
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.993 vs 1.471
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.53 GHz vs 2.25 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1047 vs 607 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 342 vs 199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.389 vs 7.897 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.509 vs 0.47 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.993 vs 1.471 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N2940
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N2940 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 607 | 1047 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1045 | 1011 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 199 | 342 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 632 | 618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.144 | 0.272 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.897 | 21.389 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.116 | 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.47 | 0.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.471 | 1.993 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1298 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1298 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron N2940 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Penryn |
| Launch date | 22 May 2014 | 15 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 3155 | 3158 |
| Processor Number | N2940 | T9400 |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $316 | |
| Price now | $69.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.31 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.83 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 6134 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.25 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 410 million | |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.162V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.32 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 313 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 854 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 854 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron N2940 with others
IntelCeleron N2940 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T8100
IntelCeleron N2940 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T9400
IntelCeleron N2940 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P8800
