Intel Celeron N3150 vs Intel Celeron 1005M

Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N3150 and Intel Celeron 1005M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N3150

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
  • Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.08 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1192 vs 1108
  • Around 3% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 655 vs 633
  • Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.724 vs 2.937
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.484 vs 0.149
  • Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.104 vs 3.522
  • Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.375 vs 1.277
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 April 2015 vs 1 July 2013
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Number of threads 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 2.08 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 22 nm
L2 cache 2 MB vs 512 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 6 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 1192 vs 1108
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 655 vs 633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.724 vs 2.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.484 vs 0.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.104 vs 3.522
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.375 vs 1.277

Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1005M

  • Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 90°C
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 79% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1016 vs 568
  • Around 77% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 339 vs 192
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.453 vs 8.191
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1949 vs 1471
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1949 vs 1471
Specifications (specs)
Maximum core temperature 105 °C vs 90°C
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1016 vs 568
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 339 vs 192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 16.453 vs 8.191
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1949 vs 1471
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1949 vs 1471

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Celeron N3150
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 1005M

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
568
1016
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1192
1108
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
192
339
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
655
633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
4.724
2.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
8.191
16.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.484
0.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
5.104
3.522
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.375
1.277
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1471
1949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1471
1949
Name Intel Celeron N3150 Intel Celeron 1005M
PassMark - Single thread mark 568 1016
PassMark - CPU mark 1192 1108
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 192 339
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 655 633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.724 2.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 8.191 16.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.484 0.149
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.104 3.522
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.375 1.277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1471 1949
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1471 1949

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Celeron N3150 Intel Celeron 1005M

Essentials

Architecture codename Braswell Ivy Bridge
Launch date 1 April 2015 1 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $107 $86
Place in performance rating 2760 2762
Processor Number N3150 1005M
Series Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series
Status Discontinued Launched
Vertical segment Mobile Mobile

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 1.60 GHz 1.90 GHz
L2 cache 2 MB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 22 nm
Maximum core temperature 90°C 105 °C
Maximum frequency 2.08 GHz 1.9 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Number of threads 4 2
Bus Speed 5 GT/s DMI
Die size 94 mm
L1 cache 128 KB
L3 cache 2048 KB

Memory

Max memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory size 8 GB 32 GB
Supported memory types DDR3L-1600 DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600
Maximum memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s

Graphics

Execution Units 12
Graphics base frequency 320 MHz 650 MHz
Graphics max frequency 640 MHz 1 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology
Intel® Clear Video technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Max video memory 8 GB
Processor graphics Intel HD Graphics Intel HD Graphics
Graphics max dynamic frequency 1.00 GHz
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
eDP
HDMI
Number of displays supported 3 3
Wireless Display (WiDi) support
CRT
SDVO

Graphics API support

DirectX Yes
OpenGL Yes

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 25mm x 27mm 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B)
Scenario Design Power (SDP) 4 W
Sockets supported FCBGA1170 FCPGA988
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

Peripherals

Integrated LAN
Max number of PCIe lanes 4 16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports 2
Number of USB ports 5
PCI Express revision 2.0 2.0
PCIe configurations 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4
Total number of SATA ports 2
UART
USB revision 2.0/3.0

Security & Reliability

Anti-Theft technology
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection technology
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key technology
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Secure Boot

Advanced Technologies

4G WiMAX Wireless
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO)
HD Audio
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST)
Intel® Smart Response technology
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Smart Connect
Thermal Monitoring
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® My WiFi technology

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)