Intel Celeron N3350 vs AMD E1-6010
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron N3350 and AMD E1-6010 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N3350
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 10 Watt
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 800 vs 427
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1108 vs 538
- 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 290 vs 142
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 530 vs 250
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 446 vs 377
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1140 vs 877
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 446 vs 377
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1140 vs 877
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2016 vs 29 April 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 10 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 800 vs 427 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1108 vs 538 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 290 vs 142 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 530 vs 250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 446 vs 377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1140 vs 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 446 vs 377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1140 vs 877 |
Reasons to consider the AMD E1-6010
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2018 vs 1444
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2018 vs 1444
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2018 vs 1444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2018 vs 1444 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N3350
CPU 2: AMD E1-6010
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N3350 | AMD E1-6010 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 800 | 427 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1108 | 538 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 290 | 142 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 530 | 250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 446 | 377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1140 | 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1444 | 2018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 446 | 377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1140 | 877 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1444 | 2018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.689 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 11.178 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron N3350 | AMD E1-6010 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake | Beema |
| Launch date | 1 September 2016 | 29 April 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2519 | 2768 |
| Processor Number | N3350 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Laptop |
| Family | AMD E-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | EM6010IUJ23JB | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.35 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | DDR3L-1333 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x5A85 | |
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics |
| Enduro | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 24mm x 31mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1296 | FT3b |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 6 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||