Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700

Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

  • CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
  • Around 16% higher maximum core temperature: 72.4°C vs 62.2°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 62% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 105 Watt
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1234 vs 1074
  • Around 20% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 422 vs 353
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.311 vs 24.478
Specifications (specs)
Launch date January 2008 vs April 2007
Maximum frequency 3 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
Maximum core temperature 72.4°C vs 62.2°C
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 105 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1234 vs 1074
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 422 vs 353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 26.311 vs 24.478

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 73% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2096 vs 1210
  • Around 51% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1114 vs 738
  • Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.576 vs 0.33
  • Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.148 vs 0.099
  • Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.829 vs 0.68
  • Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.217 vs 2.408
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 4 vs 2
L1 cache 256 KB vs 128 KB
L2 cache 8192 KB vs 6144 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 2096 vs 1210
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1114 vs 738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.576 vs 0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.148 vs 0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.829 vs 0.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.217 vs 2.408

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1234
1074
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1210
2096
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
422
353
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
738
1114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.33
0.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
26.311
24.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.099
0.148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.68
0.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
2.408
4.217
Name Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
PassMark - Single thread mark 1234 1074
PassMark - CPU mark 1210 2096
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 422 353
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 738 1114
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 2400
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.33 0.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 26.311 24.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.099 0.148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 0.68 0.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.408 4.217

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700

Essentials

Architecture codename Wolfdale Kentsfield
Launch date January 2008 April 2007
Place in performance rating 2981 3062
Price now $129.95 $44.99
Processor Number E8400 Q6700
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 4.87 21.53
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 3.00 GHz 2.66 GHz
Bus Speed 1333 MHz FSB 1066 MHz FSB
Die size 107 mm2 286 mm2
L1 cache 128 KB 256 KB
L2 cache 6144 KB 8192 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 65 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C 62 °C
Maximum core temperature 72.4°C 62.2°C
Maximum frequency 3 GHz 2.67 GHz
Number of cores 2 4
Transistor count 410 million 582 million
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V 0.8500V-1.500V

Memory

Supported memory types DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported LGA775 LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 105 Watt

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)