Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

  • CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1283 vs 1237
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2478 vs 1206
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 422
  • Around 90% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1400 vs 738
  • Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.587 vs 0.33
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.945 vs 26.311
  • Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.162 vs 0.099
  • Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.175 vs 0.68
  • Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.276 vs 2.408
Specifications (specs)
Launch date August 2008 vs January 2008
Number of cores 4 vs 2
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) vs 128 KB
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1283 vs 1237
PassMark - CPU mark 2478 vs 1206
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 444 vs 422
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1400 vs 738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.587 vs 0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 30.945 vs 26.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.162 vs 0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.175 vs 0.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.276 vs 2.408

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

  • Around 1% higher maximum core temperature: 72.4°C vs 71.4°C
  • Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Maximum core temperature 72.4°C vs 71.4°C
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 95 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1283
1237
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
2478
1206
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
444
422
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1400
738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.587
0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
30.945
26.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.162
0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.175
0.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
4.276
2.408
Name Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
PassMark - Single thread mark 1283 1237
PassMark - CPU mark 2478 1206
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 444 422
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1400 738
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 0 2400
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.587 0.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 30.945 26.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.162 0.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.175 0.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.276 2.408

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Essentials

Architecture codename Yorkfield Wolfdale
Launch date August 2008 January 2008
Place in performance rating 2987 2971
Price now $54.49 $129.95
Processor Number Q9650 E8400
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 22.69 4.87
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 3.00 GHz 3.00 GHz
Bus Speed 1333 MHz FSB 1333 MHz FSB
Die size 214 mm2 107 mm2
L1 cache 64 KB (per core) 128 KB
L2 cache 6144 KB (per die) 6144 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 45 nm
Maximum core temperature 71.4°C 72.4°C
Maximum frequency 3 GHz 3 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Transistor count 820 million 410 million
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V 0.8500V-1.3625V
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 72 °C

Memory

Supported memory types DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported LGA775 LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)