Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 321 vs 298
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 535 vs 506
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.075 vs 0.074
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.479 vs 0.344
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 January 2008 vs 2 September 2007 |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 970 vs 969 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 321 vs 298 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 535 vs 506 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.075 vs 0.074 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.479 vs 0.344 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 948 vs 896
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 17.798 vs 15.787
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.895 vs 1.875
Specifications (specs) | |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 3072 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 948 vs 896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.26 vs 0.259 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 17.798 vs 15.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.895 vs 1.875 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 970 | 969 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 896 | 948 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 321 | 298 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 535 | 506 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.259 | 0.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.787 | 17.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.075 | 0.074 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.479 | 0.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.875 | 1.895 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
Launch date | 10 January 2008 | 2 September 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $241 | $307 |
Place in performance rating | 3195 | 3198 |
Price now | $213.99 | $59.95 |
Processor Number | T8300 | T7700 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.03 | 6.97 |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
L2 cache | 3072 KB | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
VID voltage range | 1.000V-1.250V | |
L1 cache | 64 KB | |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |