Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 and Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 974 vs 969
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2009 vs 10 January 2008 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 974 vs 969 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.26 GHz
- Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 894 vs 849
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 321 vs 291
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 535 vs 505
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.259 vs 0.247
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.787 vs 15.219
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.075 vs 0.073
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.479 vs 0.448
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.875 vs 1.772
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.26 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 90°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 894 vs 849 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 321 vs 291 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 535 vs 505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.259 vs 0.247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.787 vs 15.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.075 vs 0.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.479 vs 0.448 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.875 vs 1.772 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 | Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 974 | 969 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 849 | 894 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 291 | 321 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 505 | 535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.247 | 0.259 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.219 | 15.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.073 | 0.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.448 | 0.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.772 | 1.875 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 | Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Launch date | 1 October 2009 | 10 January 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 3197 | 3196 |
| Price now | $229.99 | $213.99 |
| Processor Number | P7550 | T8300 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.94 | 2.03 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $241 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.000V-1.250V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P8600
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core SU2300
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore i3-2377M
