Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 vs Intel Celeron M 575
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 and Intel Celeron M 575 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
- Around 40% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Launch date | 15 July 2008 vs 1 June 2008 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Number of threads | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 1 MB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron M 575
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 35 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
CPU 2: Intel Celeron M 575
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 | Intel Celeron M 575 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1111 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1078 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 369 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 658 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.299 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.781 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.092 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.514 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 | Intel Celeron M 575 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
Launch date | 15 July 2008 | 1 June 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $316 | $86 |
Place in performance rating | 3132 | not rated |
Price now | $89.95 | |
Processor Number | T9600 | 575 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.31 | |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 667 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 667 MHz |
L2 cache | 6134 KB | 1 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Number of threads | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.2125V | 0.95-1.30V |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | BGA479, PGA478 | PPGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 31 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |