Intel Core 2 Quad Q7600 vs Intel Pentium 4 HT 515
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q7600 and Intel Pentium 4 HT 515 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q7600
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 90 nm |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 16 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 1024 KB |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4 HT 515
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 2.93 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 95 Watt
Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz vs 2.67 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q7600 | Intel Pentium 4 HT 515 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Prescott |
Launch date | January 2001 | January 2001 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 2x 81 mm | 109 mm |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 16 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 1 |
Transistor count | 548 million | 125 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 775 | 775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 84 Watt |