Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.574 vs 0.522
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.509 vs 24.255
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.189 vs 3.829
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | August 2008 vs July 2007 |
Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.574 vs 0.522 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.509 vs 24.255 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.189 vs 3.829 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.138 vs 0.136
- 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.748 vs 0.094
Specifications (specs) | |
L2 cache | 8192 KB vs 6144 KB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 vs 0.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.748 vs 0.094 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1138 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2138 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 376 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1151 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.574 | 0.522 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.509 | 24.255 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.136 | 0.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.094 | 0.748 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.189 | 3.829 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Kentsfield |
Launch date | August 2008 | July 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 3118 | 3296 |
Price now | $33.98 | |
Processor Number | Q9400 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.99 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
Die size | 164 mm2 | 2x 143 mm |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 6144 KB | 8192 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 62 °C |
Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | |
Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 456 million | 582 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | 775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |