Intel Core Duo T2050 vs Intel Pentium 4-M 2.00
Comparative analysis of Intel Core Duo T2050 and Intel Pentium 4-M 2.00 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Duo T2050
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 32 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 333 vs 202
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2005 vs June 2002 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
L2 cache | 2048 KB vs 512 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 32 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 333 vs 202 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4-M 2.00
- Around 25% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 499 vs 498 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core Duo T2050
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4-M 2.00
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Core Duo T2050 | Intel Pentium 4-M 2.00 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 498 | 499 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 333 | 202 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core Duo T2050 | Intel Pentium 4-M 2.00 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Yonah | Northwood |
Launch date | May 2005 | June 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 3013 | 3014 |
Processor Number | T2050 | |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 533 MHz FSB | 400 MHz FSB |
Die size | 90 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 533 MHz | |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Number of threads | 2 | |
Transistor count | 151 million | 55 million |
VID voltage range | 0.7625-1.3V | 1.3V |
L1 cache | 8 KB | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 100 °C | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | PPGA478 | PPGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt | 32 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 32-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |