Intel Core i3-3225 vs AMD A6-3650
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-3225 and AMD A6-3650 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-3225
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher clock speed: 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1700 vs 1038
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2239 vs 2070
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 618 vs 333
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1394 vs 1128
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.299 vs 8.719
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.27 vs 0.158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | September 2012 vs June 2011 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1700 vs 1038 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2239 vs 2070 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 618 vs 333 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1394 vs 1128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.299 vs 8.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.27 vs 0.158 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3650
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.949 vs 2.199
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.599 vs 2.765
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.949 vs 2.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.599 vs 2.765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2340 vs 2337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2340 vs 2337 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-3225
CPU 2: AMD A6-3650
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-3225 | AMD A6-3650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1700 | 1038 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2239 | 2070 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 618 | 333 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1394 | 1128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.199 | 2.949 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.299 | 8.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.27 | 0.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.054 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.765 | 3.599 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2337 | 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2337 | 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1204 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1204 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i3-3225 | AMD A6-3650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Llano |
| Launch date | September 2012 | June 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $264 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2449 | 2451 |
| Price now | $99.99 | |
| Processor Number | i3-3225 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.77 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.30 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Die size | 118 mm | 228 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 65.3°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Transistor count | 1178 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1333/1600 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x152 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1155 | FM1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011C | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i3-3225 with others
IntelCore i3-3225 vs
IntelPentium E6800
IntelCore i3-3225 vs
AMDPhenom II X4 850
IntelCore i3-3225 vs
AMDA6-3650
IntelCore i3-3225 vs
IntelCore i5-2550K
IntelCore i3-3225 vs
IntelCore i5-3330S
IntelCore i3-3225 vs
AMDA4-7300
