Intel Core i3-4160T vs AMD A6-5400K
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-4160T and AMD A6-5400K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-4160T
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1750 vs 1269
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3113 vs 1275
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 682 vs 427
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1481 vs 641
- 23.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.989 vs 0.596
- 34.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 126.028 vs 3.665
- 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.862 vs 0.122
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 8.871 vs 1.733
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 838 vs 603
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 838 vs 603
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | July 2014 vs October 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1750 vs 1269 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3113 vs 1275 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 682 vs 427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1481 vs 641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.989 vs 0.596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 126.028 vs 3.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.862 vs 0.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.871 vs 1.733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 838 vs 603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 838 vs 603 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-5400K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 16% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.9 vs 8.064
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2696 vs 1580
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4873 vs 2829
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2696 vs 1580
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4873 vs 2829
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.9 vs 8.064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2696 vs 1580 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4873 vs 2829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2696 vs 1580 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4873 vs 2829 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-4160T
CPU 2: AMD A6-5400K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-4160T | AMD A6-5400K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1750 | 1269 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3113 | 1275 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 682 | 427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1481 | 641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.989 | 0.596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 126.028 | 3.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.862 | 0.122 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.064 | 11.9 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.871 | 1.733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 838 | 603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1580 | 2696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2829 | 4873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 838 | 603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1580 | 2696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2829 | 4873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i3-4160T | AMD A6-5400K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Trinity |
| Launch date | July 2014 | October 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $142 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1771 | 1796 |
| Price now | $148.99 | |
| Processor Number | i3-4160T | |
| Series | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.73 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Die size | 177 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 70 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 66.4°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 1178 million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x41E | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 2 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1150 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013A | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i3-4160T with others
IntelCore i3-4160T vs
AMDPhenom II X6 1075T
IntelCore i3-4160T vs
IntelPentium G2100T
IntelCore i3-4160T vs
AMDA6-5400K
IntelCore i3-4160T vs
IntelCore i5-4590S
IntelCore i3-4160T vs
IntelCore i7-6800K
IntelCore i3-4160T vs
AMDA4 PRO-7300B
