Intel Core i5-6400T vs AMD A10-6800K
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-6400T and AMD A10-6800K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-6400T
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1619 vs 1596
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4263 vs 3199
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 707 vs 542
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2240 vs 1494
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.287 vs 4.893
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 71.941 vs 10.547
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.628 vs 0.209
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 14.358 vs 3.801
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1419 vs 1267
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1419 vs 1267
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 August 2015 vs 4 June 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 192 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1619 vs 1596 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 4263 vs 3199 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 707 vs 542 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2240 vs 1494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.287 vs 4.893 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 71.941 vs 10.547 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.628 vs 0.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.358 vs 3.801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1419 vs 1267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1419 vs 1267 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-6800K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 57% higher clock speed: 4.4 GHz vs 2.80 GHz
- Around 12% higher maximum core temperature: 74°C vs 66°C
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.604 vs 0.521
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4136 vs 2599
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4604 vs 4532
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4136 vs 2599
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4604 vs 4532
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 4.4 GHz vs 2.80 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 74°C vs 66°C |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.604 vs 0.521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4136 vs 2599 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4604 vs 4532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4136 vs 2599 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4604 vs 4532 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-6400T
CPU 2: AMD A10-6800K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-6400T | AMD A10-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1619 | 1596 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 4263 | 3199 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 707 | 542 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2240 | 1494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.287 | 4.893 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 71.941 | 10.547 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.628 | 0.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.521 | 0.604 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.358 | 3.801 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1419 | 1267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2599 | 4136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4532 | 4604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1419 | 1267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2599 | 4136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4532 | 4604 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-6400T | AMD A10-6800K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Skylake | Richland |
| Launch date | 5 August 2015 | 4 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $192 | $142 |
| Place in performance rating | 1496 | 1514 |
| Price now | $169 | |
| Processor Number | i5-6400T | |
| Series | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.76 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| OPN PIB | AD680KWOHLBOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD680KWOA44HL | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.20 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximum core temperature | 66°C | 74°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.80 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Die size | 246 mm | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Transistor count | 1303 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x1912 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 950 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 950 MHz | 844 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
| Enduro | ||
| iGPU core count | 384 | |
| Number of pipelines | 384 | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015A (35W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||