Intel Core i7-950 vs Intel Celeron E1200
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-950 and Intel Celeron E1200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-950
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 108% higher clock speed: 3.33 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1380 vs 580
- 6.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3217 vs 516
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2092 vs 1252
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | June 2009 vs January 2008 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.33 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1380 vs 580 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3217 vs 516 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2092 vs 1252 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron E1200
- Around 8% higher maximum core temperature: 73.3°C vs 67.9°C
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 867 vs 535
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 73.3°C vs 67.9°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 867 vs 535 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-950
CPU 2: Intel Celeron E1200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-950 | Intel Celeron E1200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1380 | 580 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3217 | 516 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 535 | 867 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2092 | 1252 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2502 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.028 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 61.244 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.376 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.712 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.077 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i7-950 | Intel Celeron E1200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield | Conroe |
| Launch date | June 2009 | January 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $290 | $40 |
| Place in performance rating | 2639 | 2629 |
| Price now | $329.99 | $225 |
| Processor Number | i7-950 | E1200 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Celeron® Processor |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.96 | 1.13 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.06 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4.8 GT/s QPI | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 77 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1333 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 67.9°C | 73.3°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.33 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of QPI Links | 1 | |
| Number of threads | 8 | |
| Transistor count | 731 million | 105 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.800V-1.375V | 0.8500V-1.5V |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 3 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 42.5mm x 45.0mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1366 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i7-950 with others
IntelCore i7-950 vs
IntelCeleron 440
IntelCore i7-950 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E8300
IntelCore i7-950 vs
AMDAthlon 64 X2 5800+
IntelCore i7-950 vs
AMDPhenom II X4 910
IntelCore i7-950 vs
AMDAthlon II X2 220
IntelCore i7-950 vs
IntelCore i5-2400S
