Intel Core i7-9750H vs AMD RX-418GD
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-9750H and AMD RX-418GD processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-9750H
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- 8 more threads: 12 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2012 vs 1050
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2012 vs 1050
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4430 vs 1543
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4430 vs 1543
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8336 vs 4536
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8336 vs 4536
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 21 October 2015 |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 12 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| L1 cache | 384 KB vs 320 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2012 vs 1050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2012 vs 1050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4430 vs 1543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4430 vs 1543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8336 vs 4536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8336 vs 4536 |
Reasons to consider the AMD RX-418GD
- Around 71011% higher clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 4.50 GHz
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
| Maximum frequency | 3200 MHz vs 4.50 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1.5 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-9750H
CPU 2: AMD RX-418GD
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-9750H | AMD RX-418GD |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1068 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5019 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3768 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2012 | 1050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2012 | 1050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4430 | 1543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4430 | 1543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8336 | 4536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8336 | 4536 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i7-9750H | AMD RX-418GD | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Merlin Falcon |
| Family | Core i7 | AMD R-Series |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 21 October 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $395 | |
| Place in performance rating | 480 | 1152 |
| Processor Number | i7-9750H | |
| Series | i7-9000 | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Embedded |
| Price now | RX-418GD | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI | |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 4.50 GHz | 3200 MHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 4 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Die size | 1073 mm2 | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.8 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR3-2133, DDR4-2400 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E9B | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon R6 series |
| Number of pipelines | 384 | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@30Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 35 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1440 | BGA (FP4) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 12-35 Watt | |
| Package Size | micro-BGA | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 3.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i7-9750H with others
IntelCore i7-9750H vs
IntelCore i5-1035G4
IntelCore i7-9750H vs
IntelCore i7-11600H
IntelCore i7-9750H vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 5675U
IntelCore i7-9750H vs
IntelPentium Gold 8505
IntelCore i7-9750H vs
AMDRyzen 5 7535U
IntelCore i7-9750H vs
AMDRyzen Z1 Extreme
