Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i7-9700F
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Core i7-9700F processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-13900H
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 6 more cores, run more applications at once: 14 vs 8
- 12 more threads: 20 vs 8
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 5.40 GHz vs 4.70 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 14x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3784 vs 2743
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 27964 vs 13195
- Around 51% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 7751 vs 5121
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 23 April 2019 |
Number of cores | 14 vs 8 |
Number of threads | 20 vs 8 |
Maximum frequency | 5.40 GHz vs 4.70 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
L1 cache | 1120 KB vs 512 KB |
L2 cache | 28 MB vs 2 MB |
L3 cache | 24 MB vs 12 MB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 3784 vs 2743 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 27964 vs 13195 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7751 vs 5121 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-9700F
- 2x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 64 GB
Maximum memory size | 128 GB vs 64 GB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-13900H
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-9700F
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 3784 | 2743 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 27964 | 13195 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7751 | 5121 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1207 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 6657 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core i9-13900H | Intel Core i7-9700F | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 23 April 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $196 | $323, $335 |
Place in performance rating | 365 | 1114 |
Processor Number | i9-13900H | i7-9700F |
Series | 13th Generation Intel Core i9 Processors | |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
L1 cache | 1120 KB | 512 KB |
L2 cache | 28 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 24 MB | 12 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100 °C |
Maximum frequency | 5.40 GHz | 4.70 GHz |
Number of cores | 14 | 8 |
Number of threads | 20 | 8 |
Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | |
Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
Supported memory types | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666 |
ECC memory support | ||
Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Graphics |
||
Device ID | 0xA7A0 | |
Execution Units | 96 | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.50 GHz | |
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics eligible | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
Number of displays supported | 4 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 50 mm x 25 mm | |
Sockets supported | FCBGA1744 | FCLGA1151 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 28 | 16 |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 |
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
Speed Shift technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |