Intel Core i9-13900TE vs Intel Core i5-8265U
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i9-13900TE and Intel Core i5-8265U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-13900TE
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 20 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 4
- 24 more threads: 32 vs 8
- Around 28% higher clock speed: 5.00 GHz vs 3.90 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 7.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 32x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 6x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 32 GB
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2209 vs 2075
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 15819 vs 5985
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 21 August 2018 |
| Number of cores | 24 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 32 vs 8 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.00 GHz vs 3.90 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| L1 cache | 1920 KB vs 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 32 MB vs 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 36 MB vs 6 MB |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB vs 32 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2209 vs 2075 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 15819 vs 5985 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-8265U
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-13900TE
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-8265U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i9-13900TE | Intel Core i5-8265U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2209 | 2075 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 15819 | 5985 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 908 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2803 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2529 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.164 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 296.492 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.652 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.731 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.943 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1665 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5740 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1665 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3208 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5740 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i9-13900TE | Intel Core i5-8265U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake | Whiskey Lake |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 21 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 887 | 902 |
| Processor Number | i9-13900TE | i5-8265U |
| Series | 13th Generation Intel Core i9 Processors | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Mobile |
| Price now | $297 | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.04 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| L1 cache | 1920 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 32 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 36 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 5.00 GHz | 3.90 GHz |
| Number of cores | 24 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 32 | 8 |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | |
| Die size | 123 mm | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0xA780 | 0x3EA0 |
| Execution Units | 32 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.65 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel® UHD Graphics 620 |
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Max video memory | 32 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 4 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 45.0 mm x 37.5 mm | 46x24 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2020C | |
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.80 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1528 | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 5.0 and 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16+4, 2x8+4 | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i9-13900TE with others
IntelCore i9-13900TE vs
IntelCore i5-8305G
IntelCore i9-13900TE vs
AMDRX-418GD
IntelCore i9-13900TE vs
IntelCore i9-10980HK
IntelCore i9-13900TE vs
AMDRyzen 5 3500C
IntelCore i9-13900TE vs
IntelCore i5-1130G7
IntelCore i9-13900TE vs
AMDAthlon Gold 7220U
