Intel Pentium 2117U vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium 2117U and Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 2117U
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1022 vs 905
- 10.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.42 vs 0.24
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.124 vs 0.079
- 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.503 vs 0.408
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 vs 18 August 2007 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C vs 100°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1022 vs 905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.42 vs 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.124 vs 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.503 vs 0.408 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
- Around 44% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1427 vs 347
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2203 vs 643
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18.982 vs 13.717
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.074 vs 1.307
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 935 vs 931 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1427 vs 347 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2203 vs 643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.982 vs 13.717 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.074 vs 1.307 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium 2117U
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium 2117U | Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 931 | 935 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1022 | 905 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 347 | 1427 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 643 | 2203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.42 | 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.717 | 18.982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.124 | 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.503 | 0.408 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.307 | 2.074 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1906 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1906 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium 2117U | Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Merom |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 | 18 August 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | $515 |
| Place in performance rating | 2802 | 2808 |
| Price now | $134 | $607.99 |
| Processor Number | 2117U | T7800 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor 2000 Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.66 | 0.78 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.80 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 118 mm | 143 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 291 million |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.250V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 31mm x 24mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | PBGA479, PPGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium 2117U with others
IntelPentium 2117U vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7800
IntelPentium 2117U vs
IntelPentium B940
IntelPentium 2117U vs
IntelAtom x7-Z8700
IntelPentium 2117U vs
AMDGX-217GA
