Intel Pentium E5400 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium E5400 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium E5400
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher clock speed: 2.7 GHz vs 2.33 GHz
- Around 4% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 71.4°C
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1081 vs 997
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | January 2009 vs August 2008 |
Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz vs 2.33 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C vs 71.4°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1081 vs 997 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1781 vs 975
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 320 vs 318
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1006 vs 543
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.501 vs 0.302
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.702 vs 13.111
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.111 vs 0.076
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.688 vs 2.098
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2048 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1781 vs 975 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 320 vs 318 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1006 vs 543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.501 vs 0.302 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.702 vs 13.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 vs 0.076 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.688 vs 2.098 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium E5400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Pentium E5400 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1081 | 997 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 975 | 1781 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 318 | 320 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 543 | 1006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.302 | 0.501 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.111 | 16.702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.076 | 0.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.098 | 3.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Pentium E5400 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Yorkfield |
Launch date | January 2009 | August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | |
Place in performance rating | 3116 | 3118 |
Price now | $19.99 | $22.99 |
Processor Number | E5400 | Q8200 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.54 | 36.05 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.70 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
Die size | 82 mm2 | 164 mm2 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | 71.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 228 million | 456 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |