Intel Pentium E5800 vs AMD Athlon II X3 440
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium E5800 and AMD Athlon II X3 440 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium E5800
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1275 vs 1193
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 382 vs 364
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.444 vs 6.176
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.556 vs 0.276
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | November 2010 vs January 2010 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB (shared) vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1275 vs 1193 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 382 vs 364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.444 vs 6.176 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.556 vs 0.276 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X3 440
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
- 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1719 vs 1178
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 942 vs 648
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.184 vs 0.389
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.124 vs 0.09
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.984 vs 2.573
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 3 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1719 vs 1178 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 942 vs 648 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.184 vs 0.389 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.124 vs 0.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.984 vs 2.573 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium E5800
CPU 2: AMD Athlon II X3 440
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium E5800 | AMD Athlon II X3 440 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1275 | 1193 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1178 | 1719 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 382 | 364 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 648 | 942 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.389 | 2.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.444 | 6.176 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.09 | 0.124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.556 | 0.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.573 | 2.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium E5800 | AMD Athlon II X3 440 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Rana |
| Launch date | November 2010 | January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $68 | $47 |
| Place in performance rating | 3080 | 3083 |
| Price now | $29.99 | $26.99 |
| Processor Number | E5800 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.63 | 28.04 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.20 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 169 mm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 512 KB (per core) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 3 |
| Transistor count | 228 million | 300 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | AM3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||