Intel Pentium E5800 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium E5800 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium E5800
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- Around 4% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 71.4°C
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1272 vs 1060
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 382 vs 337
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | November 2010 vs November 2008 |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C vs 71.4°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1272 vs 1060 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 382 vs 337 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1891 vs 1167
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1061 vs 648
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.538 vs 0.389
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.964 vs 10.444
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.135 vs 0.09
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.117 vs 0.556
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.999 vs 2.573
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2048 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1891 vs 1167 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1061 vs 648 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.538 vs 0.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.964 vs 10.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.135 vs 0.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.117 vs 0.556 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.999 vs 2.573 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium E5800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Pentium E5800 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1272 | 1060 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1167 | 1891 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 382 | 337 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 648 | 1061 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.389 | 0.538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.444 | 15.964 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.09 | 0.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.556 | 1.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.573 | 3.999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Pentium E5800 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Yorkfield |
Launch date | November 2010 | November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $68 | |
Place in performance rating | 3073 | 3080 |
Price now | $29.99 | $49.99 |
Processor Number | E5800 | Q8300 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.63 | 17.60 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.20 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
Die size | 82 mm2 | 164 mm2 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 4096 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | 71.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 228 million | 456 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |