Intel Pentium E6500 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium E6500 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium E6500
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher clock speed: 2.93 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- Around 4% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 71.4°C
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1245 vs 1061
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 355 vs 337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | August 2009 vs November 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz vs 2.5 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C vs 71.4°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1245 vs 1061 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 355 vs 337 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1906 vs 1183
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1061 vs 625
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.538 vs 0.322
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.964 vs 13.914
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.135 vs 0.097
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.117 vs 0.533
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.999 vs 2.296
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2048 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1906 vs 1183 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1061 vs 625 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.538 vs 0.322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.964 vs 13.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.135 vs 0.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.117 vs 0.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.999 vs 2.296 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium E6500
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium E6500 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1245 | 1061 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1183 | 1906 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 355 | 337 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 625 | 1061 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.322 | 0.538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.914 | 15.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 | 0.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.533 | 1.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.296 | 3.999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium E6500 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Yorkfield |
| Launch date | August 2009 | November 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $50 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3102 | 3088 |
| Price now | $157.95 | $49.99 |
| Processor Number | E6500 | Q8300 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.28 | 17.60 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.93 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 164 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C | 71.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 228 million | 456 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V – 1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
