Intel Pentium N3530 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium N3530 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium N3530
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 75% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 9.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.124 vs 0.324
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.161 vs 0.094
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 February 2014 vs 1 April 2009 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| L1 cache | 224 KB vs 128 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 vs 1190 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.124 vs 0.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.161 vs 0.094 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
- Around 19% higher clock speed: 3.06 GHz vs 2.58 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1184 vs 700
- 2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 219
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 760 vs 697
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 23.559 vs 10.987
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.622 vs 0.562
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.322 vs 1.901
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.06 GHz vs 2.58 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1184 vs 700 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 vs 219 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 760 vs 697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 23.559 vs 10.987 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.622 vs 0.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.322 vs 1.901 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium N3530
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium N3530 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 700 | 1184 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 | 1190 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 219 | 444 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 697 | 760 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.124 | 0.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.987 | 23.559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.161 | 0.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.562 | 0.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.901 | 2.322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1398 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium N3530 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail | Penryn |
| Launch date | 23 February 2014 | 1 April 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 3058 | 3065 |
| Processor Number | N3530 | T9900 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | |
| Price now | $398.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.57 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.16 GHz | 3.06 GHz |
| L1 cache | 224 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 6134 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.58 GHz | 3.06 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| VID voltage range | 0.40V – 1.14V | 1.050V-1.2125V |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 410 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L 1333 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 313 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 896 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 896 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 35mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.5 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1170 | BGA479, PGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium N3530 with others
IntelPentium N3530 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T9900
IntelPentium N3530 vs
IntelCore i5-460M
IntelPentium N3530 vs
IntelCore i3-2365M
