Intel Xeon E5520 vs Intel Xeon W3540
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5520 and Intel Xeon W3540 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5520
- Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 72°C vs 67.9°C
- 6x more maximum memory size: 144 GB vs 24 GB
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4633 vs 3109
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.453 vs 0.976
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 62.27 vs 50.158
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.429 vs 0.307
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.436 vs 1.621
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.95 vs 4.438
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum core temperature | 72°C vs 67.9°C |
Maximum memory size | 144 GB vs 24 GB |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 4633 vs 3109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.453 vs 0.976 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.27 vs 50.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.429 vs 0.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.436 vs 1.621 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.95 vs 4.438 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W3540
- Around 26% higher clock speed: 3.20 GHz vs 2.53 GHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1297 vs 1103
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 534 vs 397
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2148 vs 1969
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 3.20 GHz vs 2.53 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1297 vs 1103 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 534 vs 397 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2148 vs 1969 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5520
CPU 2: Intel Xeon W3540
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Xeon E5520 | Intel Xeon W3540 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1103 | 1297 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 4633 | 3109 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 397 | 534 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1969 | 2148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.453 | 0.976 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.27 | 50.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.429 | 0.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.436 | 1.621 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.95 | 4.438 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Xeon E5520 | Intel Xeon W3540 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Nehalem EP | Bloomfield |
Launch date | March 2009 | March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $19 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 2717 | 2729 |
Price now | $42.39 | $19.92 |
Processor Number | E5520 | W3540 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors |
Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.90 | 80.92 |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
Bus Speed | 5.86 GT/s QPI | 4.8 GT/s QPI |
Die size | 263 mm2 | 263 mm2 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 8192 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 72°C | 67.9°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.53 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of QPI Links | 2 | 1 |
Number of threads | 8 | 8 |
Transistor count | 731 million | 731 million |
VID voltage range | 0.75V -1.35V | 0.800V-1.375V |
Memory |
||
ECC memory support | ||
Max memory channels | 3 | 3 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 144 GB | 24 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Package Size | 42.5mm x 45mm | 42.5mm x 45.0mm |
Sockets supported | FCLGA1366 | FCLGA1366 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 130 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 40-bit | 36-bit |
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | |
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |