Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 vs AMD EPYC 9474F
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 and AMD EPYC 9474F processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon Platinum 8468
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 25% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2097152x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 430080x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 360 Watt
| Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 vs 10 Nov 2022 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) vs 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 105 MB vs 256MB (shared) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt vs 360 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9474F
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 4.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3223 vs 2735
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 147996 vs 116663
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 4.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 10 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3223 vs 2735 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 147996 vs 116663 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon Platinum 8468
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9474F
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 | AMD EPYC 9474F |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2735 | 3223 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 116663 | 147996 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 | AMD EPYC 9474F | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Jan 2023 | 10 Nov 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7214 | |
| Place in performance rating | 47 | 7 |
| Architecture codename | Zen 4 (Genoa) | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Die size | 4x 477 mm² | 8x 72 mm² |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 105 MB | 256MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 79°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Number of cores | 48 | 48 |
| Number of threads | 96 | 96 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Transistor count | 52,560 million | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 MHz, Twelve-channel |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | 4677 | SP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 360 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 320-400 W | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 80 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) |